Skip to main content
DevOps & GitOps
14 min
Expert Guide
Updated Nov 2025

Ephemeral Environments: Replace Staging with On-Demand Previews

Implement preview environments for every pull request using Kubernetes namespaces and GitOps automation.
🎯 Quick Answer

What are ephemeral environments and their cost breakdown?

Ephemeral environments are temporary, on-demand environments (dev, staging, preview) created per PR/feature and destroyed after use. **Cost breakdown:** Compute (50-60% - EKS/GKE nodes running only during testing), Storage (15-20% - S3 for artifacts, EBS volumes), Databases (20-25% - RDS snapshots, seeded test data), Networking (5-10% - load balancers, data transfer). **Typical costs:** $0.50-$2/hour per environment, $5-$15 per PR lifecycle (2-8 hours). For 20 PRs/week: $400-$1,200/month vs. $5K-$10K for persistent staging environments (60-80% savings). Auto-destroy after merge/inactivity. Tools: GitHub Actions, ArgoCD, Terraform, Kubernetes namespaces. ROI: faster testing (parallel environments), better quality (prod-like configs), cost reduction through ephemeral nature.

Implementing Ephemeral Environments for Development and Testing

Ephemeral environments are temporary setups used in software development and testing that mimic production environments. These environments are created on-demand and are destroyed after use, promoting a more dynamic, flexible, and cost-effective approach to software development and testing. This guide delves into the concept of ephemeral environments, their benefits, and how to implement them using Infrastructure as Code (IaC) with tools like Terraform, Kubernetes, and GitHub Actions.

What Are Ephemeral Environments?

Ephemeral environments are short-lived and are typically spun up for a single purpose, such as testing a feature branch, running integration tests, or conducting performance testing. Unlike static environments, which are long-standing and often shared among multiple features or teams, ephemeral environments are created on-demand and disposed of once their purpose is served, ensuring a clean, isolated, and consistent environment for every test or development task.

Benefits of Ephemeral Environments

- **Isolation:** Each task or feature is tested in a separate environment, reducing the risk of conflicts and interferences. - **Resource Efficiency:** Resources are only consumed when needed, allowing for better utilization and lowering costs. - **Faster Feedback Loops:** Developers and testers receive immediate feedback on their work, accelerating the development process. - **Reproducibility:** The environment can be replicated easily, ensuring consistency across development, testing, and production. - **Scalability:** New environments can be spun up as needed, scaling with the demands of the project or team.

Infrastructure as Code (IaC) Approach

IaC is a key enabler for ephemeral environments. It allows the entire infrastructure to be defined and managed through code, making it easy to create, duplicate, and destroy infrastructure components on demand.

Terraform

Terraform is an open-source tool created by HashiCorp that allows users to define and provision infrastructure using a high-level configuration language. It supports multiple cloud providers and services, making it an ideal tool for creating ephemeral environments.

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open-source container orchestration system for automating software deployment, scaling, and management. It's highly compatible with ephemeral environments, especially when managing containerized applications.

Implementing Ephemeral Environments

Implementing ephemeral environments involves several steps, from defining the infrastructure as code to integrating it into the CI/CD pipeline for automatic creation and destruction.

Define Infrastructure with Terraform

Start by defining your infrastructure with Terraform. This involves creating Terraform configuration files that specify the required resources for your environment.

Example: Terraform Configuration for a Kubernetes Cluster

provider "aws" {
  region = "us-west-2"
}

resource "aws_eks_cluster" "example" {
  name     = "example-cluster"
  role_arn = aws_iam_role.example.arn

  vpc_config {
    subnet_ids = aws_subnet.example[*].id
  }

  depends_on = [
    aws_iam_role_policy_attachment.example,
  ]
}

This example creates an Amazon EKS (Elastic Kubernetes Service) cluster using AWS as the provider. You would replace the placeholders with actual values specific to your project.

Automatic Creation and Destruction with CI/CD

Integrating ephemeral environments into your CI/CD pipeline automates their creation and destruction based on the pipeline's stages or actions.

GitHub Actions for Terraform

GitHub Actions can automate the process of creating and destroying ephemeral environments using Terraform. Here's how you can set up a workflow:

.github/workflows/terraform.yml

name: 'Terraform'

on:
  push:
    branches:
      - main
  pull_request:

jobs:
  terraform:
    name: 'Terraform'
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest

    steps:
    - name: Checkout code
      uses: actions/checkout@v2

    - name: Setup Terraform
      uses: hashicorp/setup-terraform@v1
      with:
        terraform_version: 0.13.0

    - name: Terraform Init
      run: terraform init

    - name: Terraform Plan
      run: terraform plan

    - name: Terraform Apply
      run: terraform apply -auto-approve

    - name: Cleanup
      if: ${{ github.event_name == 'pull_request' && github.event.action == 'closed' }}
      run: terraform destroy -auto-approve\

This GitHub Actions workflow initializes Terraform, applies the Terraform configuration when code is pushed to the main branch or a pull request is made, and destroys the environment when a pull request is closed.

Kubernetes for Container Management

Once your infrastructure is provisioned, Kubernetes can be used to deploy and manage the containers that make up your application within the ephemeral environments.

Example: Kubernetes Deployment

apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
  name: example-app
  labels:
    app: example
spec:
  replicas: 3
  selector:
    matchLabels:
      app: example
  template:
    metadata:
      labels:
        app: example
    spec:
      containers:
      - name: example-app
        image: example/app:latest
        ports:
        - containerPort: 80

This Kubernetes deployment file specifies a deployment named `example-app` with three replicas, using the `example/app:latest` Docker image.

Cost Savings

Ephemeral environments can lead to significant cost savings by:

- Reducing the need for permanent resources. - Allowing for more precise scaling, ensuring you only pay for what you use. - Decreasing the maintenance cost associated with long-lived environments.

Summary

Ephemeral environments, enabled by IaC and integrated into CI/CD pipelines, offer a flexible, efficient, and cost-effective solution for development and testing. By leveraging Terraform for infrastructure management, Kubernetes for container orchestration, and GitHub Actions for automation, teams can achieve faster feedback loops, better resource utilization, and higher quality software delivery.

See Ephemeral Environments in Action

Learn how we implemented on-demand ephemeral environments for a growing team, reducing environment wait time from days to minutes with automated teardown and PR preview URLs.

Ready to Transform Your Operations?

Get a free consultation and see how we can help you achieve these results

Frequently Asked Questions

What are ephemeral environments and how do they work?

Ephemeral environments are temporary, isolated environments automatically created for each Pull Request, feature branch, or testing scenario. They're spun up on-demand, used for testing/review, then destroyed when no longer needed (PR merged, branch deleted, or after timeout). Unlike persistent staging environments shared by all developers, ephemeral environments provide dedicated, conflict-free testing spaces. Implemented using IaC (Terraform, Kubernetes namespaces), CI/CD automation (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI), and preview deployment tools (Netlify, Vercel for frontend; ArgoCD for backend).

How much do ephemeral environments cost?

Per-environment cost: $0.50-$2/hour depending on resources (compute, database, storage). Typical PR lifecycle: 2-8 hours = $1-$16 per PR. Monthly cost for team: 20-50 PRs/week = $400-$3,200/month. Compare to persistent staging: $5K-$10K/month (60-85% savings). Costs scale with usage (pay only when testing), not time (24/7 staging). Cost factors: instance sizes, database snapshots, storage, load balancers. Optimization: auto-destroy after 2-4 hours inactivity, use Spot instances (70% discount), share databases across environments.

What tools create ephemeral environments?

Frontend: Vercel, Netlify (automatic preview deploys), Render. Backend: ArgoCD with ApplicationSets, Kubernetes with dynamic namespaces, Terraform Cloud with workspace per PR. Full-stack: Shipyard, Okteto, DevSpace, Garden. DIY: GitHub Actions + Terraform + Kubernetes. Best practice: use managed services for frontend (faster, cheaper), custom infrastructure for backend (more control). Setup time: Vercel/Netlify (5 minutes), ArgoCD (1-2 days), full DIY stack (1-2 weeks). Choose based on team size and complexity.

How to handle databases in ephemeral environments?

Options: (1) Snapshot-based: Restore from production snapshot (5-15 minutes, most realistic data), (2) Seed scripts: Initialize with synthetic data (fast but less realistic), (3) Shared database: Single test DB with namespace isolation (cheapest, risk of conflicts), (4) Containerized: Postgres/MySQL in Docker (fastest, limited scale). Best practice: production snapshots for critical testing, seed scripts for unit/integration tests. Use database-per-environment for isolation, shared for cost optimization. Automate cleanup: drop schemas on environment destruction. Cost: RDS snapshot restore $0.10-$0.50, containerized DB $0.05-$0.20/hour.

What's the ROI of ephemeral environments?

Quantifiable benefits: (1) Faster testing: parallel environments eliminate queue waits (save 2-4 hours per PR × 20 PRs/week = 40-80 hours/week), (2) Reduced bugs: prod-like testing catches issues early (30-50% fewer production incidents), (3) Better reviews: reviewers test actual changes in isolated environment, (4) Cost savings: 60-85% vs. persistent staging. Example ROI: Team of 10 engineers, $150K average salary, 40 hours/week saved = $75K annual value. Infrastructure cost: $1.5K-$3K/month. ROI: 25-50x in first year. Payback period: <1 month.

What are common pitfalls with ephemeral environments?

Common mistakes: (1) Forgetting auto-destroy (environments run 24/7, costs explode), (2) Over-provisioning resources (use smallest viable instance sizes), (3) Not handling secrets properly (hardcoded credentials), (4) Complex setup (2+ hours to create environment is too slow), (5) No monitoring (environments fail silently). Solutions: Implement strict timeouts (4-8 hours max), use infrastructure templates, centralize secret management (Vault, AWS Secrets Manager), optimize creation time (<10 minutes target), add health checks and alerts. Start simple: frontend previews first, gradually add backend complexity.

HostingX Solutions company logo

HostingX Solutions

Expert DevOps and automation services accelerating B2B delivery and operations.

michael@hostingx.co.il
+972544810489

Connect

EmailIcon

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get monthly email updates about improvements.


© 2026 HostingX Solutions LLC. All Rights Reserved.

LLC No. 0008072296 | Est. 2026 | New Mexico, USA

Legal

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Acceptable Use Policy

Security & Compliance

Security Policy

Service Level Agreement

Compliance & Certifications

Accessibility Statement

Privacy & Preferences

Cookie Policy

Manage Cookie Preferences

Data Subject Rights (DSAR)

Unsubscribe from Emails